Remote work from abroad and the new OECD update – key implications for employees and employers in Poland
23 January 2026
23 January 2026

Remote work from abroad has become a standard feature of today’s labour market. “Work from anywhere” models, temporary relocations, extended private stays combined with day-to-day duties, and foreign home offices are now common — for employees and employers alike. From a Polish tax perspective, this trend increases complexity and can create new exposure, particularly around permanent establishment, employment income taxation, and corporate obligations under Polish Corporate Income Tax (CIT) and Personal Income Tax (PIT) rules.
One of the key reference points for assessing these risks is the OECD’s updated Commentary to the OECD Model Tax Convention, published in November 2025, which for the first time addresses remote work from abroad in a broad and practical way. While the OECD Commentary is not “law”, it is frequently used to interpret double taxation agreements (DTAs) and treaty concepts — also in Poland.
The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) updated the Commentary with a focus on Article 5 — the treaty definition of a permanent establishment (PE). The update reflects how modern business operates today:
Importantly, the update does not rewrite Article 5. Instead, it meaningfully reshapes how tax authorities may interpret it in real-life remote work scenarios — moving away from a purely formal approach and towards the actual operating model and the economic role of work performed abroad.
Under Article 5 OECD Model Convention principles, a permanent establishment generally exists when a business carries on activity through a fixed place of business that:
The 2025 OECD Commentary makes it clear that an employee’s home office can, in certain circumstances, meet these conditions. That said, it does not mean that every instance of remote work from abroad automatically creates a PE.
The key question becomes: why and how the work is being performed from that country.
The OECD introduces an indicative reference point: around 50% of working time over a 12-month period may suggest that a deeper analysis is required. Crossing this level is not a PE “trigger” by itself — but it may increase scrutiny and highlight potential exposure.
Short-term, incidental remote work abroad — such as during holidays or a family visit — should generally not create a PE.
A major shift in the OECD’s approach is the emphasis on the commercial reason for an employee’s presence in a given country. PE risk typically rises when the employee’s location abroad:
Particularly sensitive roles include:
If remote work from abroad is driven purely by personal reasons (lifestyle choice, family situation) and the employer does not benefit commercially from the employee being in that country, the PE risk may be significantly lower — even where the stay is longer.
The updated OECD guidance illustrates the above with practical examples:
The 2025 update also reinforces how tax treaty principles apply to employment income earned through cross-border remote work.
From a Polish PIT and treaty perspective, a key factor is typically the place where the work is physically performed — not:
Key takeaways for employers:
In practice, this means employers with operations in Poland should align remote work policies with DTA (double taxation agreement) rules applicable to the employee’s situation and ensure internal tracking is good enough to support payroll and tax positions.
If a remote worker’s activity abroad is treated as creating (or contributing to) a permanent establishment, the consequences for the enterprise may include:
The OECD update sends a clear message: lack of formal rules for remote work from abroad can lead to uncontrolled tax consequences.
Recommended actions typically include:
A robust remote work-from-abroad policy should address, for example:
If you need support with assessing PE exposure and employer obligations under Polish tax rules and DTAs, consider involving tax advisory in Poland early especially when remote work becomes recurring rather than incidental.
The OECD’s November 2025 update does not introduce new binding tax rules. However, it changes how well-known treaty concepts may be applied to modern work models. Tax outcomes increasingly follow the reality of where work is performed, not only the employer’s registered office.
For employers operating in Poland, this means mobility management and permanent establishment risk need to be handled proactively — often by verifying legacy assumptions and updating internal frameworks in line with the OECD’s newer interpretative approach.
It is also worth remembering that each case of remote work from abroad requires an individual assessment that takes into account local tax rules and the provisions of applicable double taxation agreements (DTAs). The OECD Commentary is an interpretative guideline — it does not replace an analysis of the specific facts of a given situation.
If you have any further questions or require additional information, please contact your business relationship person or use the enquiry form on the HLB Poland website.
***
Download the brochures providing general information and outlining the services that are offered by HLB member firms.
Learn moreClick below for more detailed information regarding population, major towns and cities, language, religion and holidays in Poland.
Learn more