Sick leave (L4) changes in Poland 2026 – what employers need to know
9 February 2026
9 February 2026

The sick leave (L4) changes in Poland in 2026 introduce clearer rules for (1) how medical certificates are verified and (2) what an insured person can and cannot do while on sick leave without risking the loss of sickness benefit. For employers and HR/payroll teams, this matters for two practical reasons: documentation standards will be scrutinised more closely, and it will be easier to assess whether specific behaviour during sick leave may trigger benefit consequences.
The reform also has an organisational impact. It expands and structures inspection powers and updates the medical adjudication framework within the Social Insurance Institution (ZUS). As a result, companies operating in Poland should review absence-management procedures, internal communication with employees on leave, and how the organisation responds to inspection activities.
The amendment rolls out in stages. For employers, three milestones are the most relevant:
From this date, regulations organise the rules on verifying whether temporary incapacity to work (or the need to care for a sick family member) has been properly certified and whether certificates have been issued correctly.
This stage is the most important for everyday HR/payroll practice. It introduces statutory definitions of gainful work and activity inconsistent with the purpose of sick leave, and it sets out inspection powers more precisely.
This stage affects people with multiple insurance titles (e.g., more than one job/contract) and the standards of ZUS medical adjudication proceedings.
Polish rules explicitly confirm that correctness-of-certification checks also apply to leave issued due to care for a sick family member. For employers, this means absence handling should be consistent across both regular sickness absence and care-related absence.
ZUS may request explanations and information necessary during the review of a medical certificate. In practice, it helps to define a clear internal path:
The amendment structures what ZUS can do if irregularities are found in the issuance process and updates the procedure for reviewing measures related to withdrawing a doctor’s authorisation to issue certificates.
Employer takeaway: from 27 January 2026, the quality of information flow and documentation discipline becomes even more important. Even if the employer is not a party to proceedings about the certificate’s correctness, inconsistent HR/payroll data and messy communication increase the risk of settlement errors and employee disputes.
The core rule remains based on two grounds:
What changes is the precision: statutory definitions are introduced to reduce interpretation disputes.
Under the new Polish provisions, “gainful work” covers profit-oriented activities regardless of the legal basis (employment contract, civil law contract, business activity, etc.). There is an exception for incidental actions required by essential circumstances.
A key point for employers: an “essential circumstance” cannot result from an employer’s instruction. Operationally, this means managers should limit contact with employees on sick leave to strictly organisational matters unrelated to performing work — and avoid assigning any tasks.
Activity inconsistent with the purpose of sick leave means actions that hinder or prolong treatment or recovery. At the same time, the category excludes:
For the company, the goal is not to communicate generic “don’ts”, but clear principles: during sick leave, the employee should focus on recovery, and the organisation should minimise situations where the employee feels pressured to do something for work.
Checks on the correct use of sick leave in Poland may be carried out by ZUS and by contribution payers entitled to pay benefits. They can cover:
and may also apply after the sickness insurance title has ended.
From 13 April 2026, the explicitly listed powers become particularly relevant, including:
Employer takeaway: prepare an internal inspection-handling procedure, including standards for sharing information and document flow between HR and payroll. This reduces the risk of ambiguous responses and avoidable escalations.
Until the end of 2026, as a rule, incapacity due to illness applies to each sickness insurance title and requires a separate sick leave for each title. From 1 January 2027, a doctor — at the insured person’s request — will not have to issue sick leave for a specific title if work under that title is possible due to the nature of that work.
In practice, this may apply when an illness prevents one type of work but does not exclude other work of a different nature.
In this model, the insured person must inform the benefit-paying contribution payer about the period for which sick leave was issued under another title. For employers, this means defining how such information is collected and documented in the HR/payroll process.
From 1 January 2027, the reform also introduces more uniform rules on how medical opinions are issued for social insurance benefits and other tasks performed by ZUS. The changes include, among others, organisation of adjudication, allowing remote examinations in specific situations, further digitisation of documentation flow, and procedural timelines.
For companies, the impact is indirect: the changes may affect the pace and communication patterns in benefit-related cases that require ZUS medical adjudication.
Internal standards should minimise situations where an employee performs anything that could be seen as gainful work during sick leave. In particular, managers should not assign tasks. If exceptional contact is allowed, it should be clearly defined, documented, and kept to an absolute minimum.
Where HR and payroll are separate, define responsibilities in writing:
It is useful to appoint:
Employer risk often arises at the intersection of operational management and absence. Managers should understand the consequences of assigning tasks to someone on sick leave and the organisation’s internal rules.
If you deal with complex cases (multi-employment, hybrid work, frequent absences, complicated benefit settlements), external support helps keep processes consistent, timely and compliant. In this area, getsix® can support you with HR & payroll services in Poland.
Polish rules indicate that ordinary day-to-day activities are not treated as inconsistent with the purpose of sick leave, as long as they do not hinder treatment or recovery. In practice, the assessment should reflect the person’s health condition and medical recommendations.
The amendment provides an exclusion for incidental actions taken due to essential circumstances. From an employer perspective, the key is not to initiate such actions via an instruction and not to create a repeatable pattern of professional activity during sick leave.
From 1 January 2027, it will be possible — at the insured person’s request — for sick leave not to cover a given title if work is possible due to the nature of that work. In such cases, the insured person must meet information duties towards the benefit-paying contribution payer.
If your organisation wants to reduce dispute risk and improve absence handling, treat these changes as an HR/payroll process project: update policies, train managers, organise document flows, and standardise how you respond to inspection activities.
Legal basis:
If you have any further questions or require additional information, please contact your business relationship person or use the enquiry form on the HLB Poland website.
***
Download the brochures providing general information and outlining the services that are offered by HLB member firms.
Learn moreClick below for more detailed information regarding population, major towns and cities, language, religion and holidays in Poland.
Learn more